Insights & Analysis
Expert perspectives on reshoring, manufacturing strategy, and supply chain transformation
Finance, Strategy
The next reshoring boom could produce a familiar mistake: communities competing aggressively for projects without fully pricing the cost of winning. State and local incentives matter. KPMG’s 2026 tariff survey found that nearly half of respondents said state and local incentives strongly influence reshoring decisions, and 68% would reconsider reshoring if incentives were significant.
June, 2026
Compliance, Supply Chain
For years, some companies treated country of origin as a documentation exercise. That era is ending. Tariffs, forced-labor enforcement, USMCA review, and rules-of-origin scrutiny are turning origin claims into board-level risk. Companies that rely on vague supplier attestations, incomplete bills of material, or superficial “substantial transformation” narratives are moving into dangerous territory.
June, 2026
Supply Chain
A factory can be reshored without the supply chain being reshored. That distinction is now one of the most undercovered risks in U.S. industrial strategy. A company may move final assembly to Ohio, Texas, Tennessee, Arizona, or South Carolina and still depend on imported controls, sensors, specialty chemicals, machine tools, power electronics, castings, resins, circuit boards, or precision components.
June, 2026
Execution, Finance
The next reshoring bottleneck may not be capital. It may be decision architecture. From Q2 through Q4 2026, demand for reshoring consulting and advisory firms is likely to rise for a simple reason: companies have moved beyond asking whether supply chains are exposed. They now need to know what to do, in what order, and at what cost.
June, 2026
Industry
Not every industry is reconsidering reshoring for the same reason. Some are reacting to tariffs. Others are reacting to forced-labor enforcement, rules-of-origin risk, defense readiness, customer pressure, or the rising cost of long-distance supply-chain fragility. The result is not one reshoring wave. It is a series of sector-specific recalculations
June, 2026
Industry, Workforce
BPO reshoring isn’t nostalgia—it’s a CX strategy. When service is the product, latency, comprehension, and empathy matter as much as handle time. Onshore teams deliver context-rich conversations that resolve faster and retain more customers. The economics are changing. AI handles the repetitive front-door traffic; human agents focus on complex, emotional, or regulated scenarios. That mix favors higher-skill, onshore agents supported by strong tooling and knowledge bases. Compliance and data residency are growing concerns. Keeping PII and sensitive interactions under U.S. jurisdiction simplifies audits, reduces breach exposure, and aligns with sector-specific regs in healthcare, finance, and government. Language nuance and cultural proximity reduce friction. Misunderstandings drop, escalation paths shorten, and first-contact resolution improves. The cost savings show up in churn reduction and higher NPS, not just in AHT. Talent strategy is modernizing. Remote-first contact centers recruit nationwide, tapping veterans, caregivers, and career switchers. Training leverages simulations and AI-driven coaching that personalize feedback based on actual call data. Quality management is now continuous. Real-time analytics flag sentiment shifts, compliance risks, and knowledge gaps. Coaches intervene the same day, not the next quarter. The feedback loop tightens, outcomes improve. Reshoring BPO also supports product improvement. Support teams become a live sensor network feeding engineering and product with patterns and priorities. Issues get fixed upstream; ticket volume drops downstream. The brand impact is tangible. “U.S.-based support” is a marketing proof point customers recognize—and often pay for through loyalty and premium tiers.
March, 2026